UPDATE 12-12-2012
It’s the Stupidity, Stupid
Part 2
Actually,
I’m not calling everyone who reads this blog update stupid (despite the
attention grabbing title). My objective
is to warn people about the dangers and consequences of accepting stupid ideas
as revealed wisdom. After more than
eight years of stonewalling and silence, it is obvious that I have to try
harder to get the attention of the politicians, the pundits, the mainstream
media (MSM) and the general public.
Calling people stupid will usually get their attention. I am not running again for public office
(calling people stupid is not a good way to get votes). As a non candidate, I
don’t have to pander to anyone. I have a
populist message, that is: economic and social justice based on the U.S.
Constitution and existing law.
What
is the stupidity that I’m talking about?
The current budget “debate” is an exercise in stupidity that is a result
of widespread ignorance. It is ironic
that the politicians who stuck us with the sixteen trillion dollar national
debt are now frantically warning us about the evils of public debt. I think it is more realistic to think of the
politicians not as public officials, but as loan originators. After all, it was them, not the taxpayers,
who borrowed the money that put us sixteen trillion dollars in the hole. Politicians, as loan originators, serve
exactly the same function as did Mitt Romney when he owned and ran Bain
Capital. That function was/is: to borrow
huge amounts money that other people have to pay back. (And don’t forget, it was the loan originators,
working for the banks, who created the massive debt that caused the home
mortgage disaster.) I hope that everyone
who reads this blog will write or call their Congressperson and ask them this
question: If the Constitution and the law give
Congress the authority to direct the U.S. Treasury to issue debt-free legal
tender currency (United States Notes) why do we have a $16
trillion national debt? I recommend clicking on this link to
the U.S. Treasury Department web site: U.S. Treasury - FAQ: Legal Tender Status of Currency. There you will learn that everything I say
about debt-free money is true and based on existing law.
………………………………
We
have heard hundreds of times that, when President Bill Clinton left office, he
had a budget surplus. This Peace Dividend
produced a fearful reaction in Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan. Why would Greenspan fear a budget
surplus? On page 104 of the worthless,
conservative propaganda book I.O.U.S.A.,
Alice Rivlin (Director of the Office of Management and Budget under President
Bill Clinton) is quoted: [the federal budget] “had a large surplus. It had such a large surplus that people were
beginning to worry about the surplus. My
then colleague, Alan Greenspan, worried that the surplus was so large that we
would pay off the whole national debt.”
Why would that be a problem?! Ms.
Rivlin said: “Well, he thought it would be a problem because then the
government would have to buy private securities.” I hope I have finally made my point that because our money is based on debt, we
will never pay off the national debt
under our current debt based monetary system.
The national debt is an integral part of our economic/monetary system
and the foundation of the global bond market.
And, to make matters worse, U.S. government debt securities are in the
retirement portfolios of millions of Americans.
How is that for a really stupid idea?
The
George W. Bush administration inherited the Clinton surplus, and we all know
what happened next. President Bush said
he wanted to give the surplus money “back to the American people.” Well, he could have replaced some of the
money that the politicians had stolen from social security and the other “trust
funds.” But, of course, he chose tax
cuts that favored the rich. Fast forward
to September 11, 2001. The historical
record shows that the Bush administration ignored the warnings of the Clinton
administration about the threat of Al Qaeda terrorism, but that’s another
story. My point is about the
surplus. From that day in 2001, when we
were attacked, America was, and still is, at war. The justification for the Bush tax cuts was
that the surplus was the result of the Peace Dividend (lower defense
spending). According to that logic, the
tax cuts should have been rescinded on September 12, 2001. As far as I know, I am the first and only
person who has ever made this point.
Now, our elected loan originators (politicians) are using the national
debt as an excuse to attack social security, Medicare, Medicaid and other
important, necessary and beneficial government operations. Is this monumental stupidity, or is it
something more sinister and destructive?
I
think I should take some time to explain how the fiscal cliff/debt ceiling scam
goes beyond monumental stupidity into the realm of a deliberate attack on the general welfare of the American people. (These
italicized words are found in the first sentence of the U.S.
Constitution.) I’ve already established
the fact that the national debt will never be reduced or paid off under our
current debt-based monetary system.
Believe it or not, Congress could have the Treasury issue $16 trillion
of debt-free U.S. Notes and pay off the entire national debt tomorrow. Of course, the Bond Vigilante parasites, who
own our politicians and our debt, would never permit such an act of fiscal
responsibility. Also, Congress could
send massive amounts of debt-free money to state and local governments to solve
their funding problems (which are the results of the Wall Street-caused Great
Recession). Of course, that will never
happen because the tax-free municipal bond market parasites will never permit that,
either.
So,
what is all this debt alarmism really about? It is about attacking so-called
“entitlements” and destroying the power of the American government. If you listen to the disgusting rhetoric of
conservative politicians, pundits, CEOs and the think tank shills, the above
statement becomes a self-evident fact.
The PLAN is to destroy “entitlements” and starve the government into a
powerless, heartless tool of the private sector. And the totally
unnecessary national debt is the perfect lash to enforce the collective
will of the conservative politicians, CEOs and Wall Street.
When
viewed in this context, the insanely illogical drumbeat for tax cuts, with a
$16 trillion national debt, makes perfect sense.
On
this blog, I have totally debunked the “Printing Money Causes Inflation”
myth. I previously explained that
several other factors, not printing money, cause inflation. Now I would like to put this concept into the
framework of what is happening today.
The Supreme Court’s infamous Citizens United ruling is
inflationary. Why? It increased the massive amounts of corporate
and business money that floods into our corrupt electoral system. This legalized bribery money is added to the
cost of the products and services that we buy.
This obviously causes inflation.
I have a better idea for funding elections: use Treasury issued
debt-free money to publicly fund all political campaigns and kick the private
sector media out of the process. (In my
opinion, the advertising “industry” is a plague on our culture and a gigantic,
inflationary waste of money.) Candidates can make their cases for election
through a government information service.
This will save the billions of dollars that are wasted on our idiotic
electoral circus and lower the prices of many of the goods and services we
buy. Publicly funding elections with
debt-free money would be a great way to fight inflation. But, the private sector would probably just
use the money that they squandered on candidates for more dividends, more stock
buy backs and even more lavish salaries, perks and golden parachutes. That’s why price controls are the best way to
fight what I call Greed Inflation.
I
previously made the point that conservative “think tanks” are
inflationary. But I didn’t cover foundations. Massive amounts of private sector business
money floods into foundations. This
highly dubious, and in many cases wasteful, use of money is inflationary
because it adds to the cost of the goods and services that we buy. I could write many pages about the
inflationary foundation scam, but I will focus on just one: the Peter G.
Peterson Foundation.
Back
in 2008, Peterson bankrolled a piece of worthless, conservative propaganda
titled “I.O.U.S.A.” The
book rounded up a bunch of “entitlement” haters, millionaires and billionaires
to warn us about the fiscal evil and dangers of “entitlements.” The very premise of the book is enough to
turn your stomach. By the way, I was so
furious when I finished reading “I.O.U.S.A.,” that I fired off a challenge to
everyone at the Peter G. Peterson Institute and everyone involved with the
book, including former Comptroller General (and Romney supporter) David Walker,
to a public debate on my web site. Of
course, I was ignored. Plausible
deniability is very important to these people.
Let’s take a look at the “Honorable” David Walker and some of the “Cast
of Characters” of “I.O.U.S.A.” The Cast:
Former
Senator Judd Gregg: a regulation hater now working for
Goldman Sachs as a highly paid Wall Street shill.
Former
Chairman of Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, the Council on Foreign Relations and former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin,
A Wall Street billionaire who fought regulation and oversight of the financial
services “industry.” Mr. Rubin is one of the main culprits of the 2007/2008
mortgage disaster/global credit crisis.
Former
Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, He fought regulation
and oversight of the financial services “industry.” He is also one of the main culprits of the
2007/2008 mortgage disaster/global credit crisis. He is a devoted student of Ayn Rand.
Congressman
Ron Paul, Gold bug to the Tea Party. He called social security “unconstitutional.”
Some people considered his 1999 legislation, H.R. 219, back door privatization
of social security.
Investor
Warren Buffet, He is the owner of discredited Moody’s
credit rating agency. He admits that he
doesn’t work (“I get other people to do the work”). He owns things and buys stocks. How productive!
Senator
Kent Conrad: As the chairman of the Senate budget
committee, did he ever suggest using Treasury issued debt-free United States
Notes to balance the budget? Why finance
the government with borrowed money if you don’t have to? Why borrow money with a $16 trillion national
debt? Treasury issued U.S. Notes is the
only solution to our budget problems, Senator.
Former
Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volker, Historians claim that
he “cured the stagflation of the1970s with 20% interest rates.” But the resulting recession and high
unemployment indicates that the “cure” left much to be desired. Economists are still arguing about the causes
of the “stagflation,” so I guess I can add my opinion.
The
October, 1973, Arab-Israeli War caused the famous five month OPEC Arab Oil
Embargo. Somehow, we are told, this five
month embargo led to a global, decade
long stagflation crisis. The embargo
and oil production cuts were retaliation against the countries that supported
Israel in the war. But did the embargo
really cause the price of oil to quadruple?
Of course not, because OPEC didn’t set the price of oil. The price was set by the global free
market. What a golden opportunity for
the oil companies and the commodities traders to gouge, not only the hapless
American consumer, but the entire world!
(Does anybody remember the “windfall profits tax”?) Of course, high oil prices caused the price
of everything else to go up. What a
golden opportunity to blame the high prices on American workers. (Does anybody remember the so-called “vicious
wage/price spiral”?) Then, when
President Nixon tried to protect American consumers with price controls, the
oil companies simply hoarded the oil, and the result was stagflation and gas
station lines around the block. The
phony “Law of Supply and Demand” ensured that the price of gas would stay high,
and the abused American consumers would be ready and willing to go to war with
the hated Arabs.
The
weak 1920s Weimar Republic’s hands off policy toward the markets led to the
infamous hyperinflation and the catastrophic Nazi takeover of Germany. In the same way, President Nixon’s inability
to reign in the oil companies and the oil commodity markets led to stagflation
and global economic turmoil. Fiscal
stimulus, money supply growth and the inherent momentum of the American economy
eventually returned things to “normal.”
Twenty percent interest rates fixed nothing.
Former
Alcoa Chairman, former member of the Trilateral Commission and Former Reagan
Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, As far as I know, the
then Treasury Secretary O’Neill never explained what Vice President Dick Cheney
meant when he told him “Reagan proved that deficits don’t matter.” (Check out my last (9-27-2012) Update for my
explanation of Cheney’s statement.)
Investment
bank advisor Art Laffer, He gave us the discredited
“Laffer Curve” and the now discredited supply side economics. Was Laffer the unnamed Ronald Reagan staffer
who coined the phrase “Starve the Beast”?
Calling the American government a “beast” is sedition according to the
dictionary definition that I quote elsewhere on this blog.
Executive
Director of the Concord Coalition Robert Bixby,
He “educates the American people about the growing national debt.” I recommend my blog to Mr. Bixby. He might find it educational.
Billionaire
investment banker Peter G. Peterson, I have one question
for Mr. Peterson: What did you actually do to become a Wall Street Billionaire?
Former
Comptroller General David Walker, Talk about someone
being asleep at the switch! David Walker
was Comptroller General from 1998 to 2008.
Where was he when the politicians were stealing $5 trillion from the
social security and other trust funds and adding that missing money to the
national debt in the form of so-called IOUs?
Instead of whining and crying about government spending, he should have
been learning about Abraham Lincoln’s and John F. Kennedy’s debt-free, legal
tender United States Notes. Was it
willful ignorance that caused him to miss his opportunity to stop the national
debt in its tracks in 1998 when it was “only” $5,526,193,008,897? In his Annual Report to Congress, he could
have reminded the politicians of their legal and Constitutional authority to
have the Treasury issue debt-free, legal tender United States Notes instead of
borrowing money from the Bond Vigilante parasites. Thank you “deficit hawk” David Walker for
approximately $10.5 trillion of our national Debt!
So,
that’s the lowdown on the Peter G. Peterson Foundation. When these “highly respected policy analysts”
tell us that we have to slash “entitlements,” we should laugh in their faces
and ignore them. Unfortunately, this
gang of entitlement haters have great and
undeserved influence with our politicians, but they have zero credibility
with me.
……………………………………….
I’m
reading “Better, Stronger, Faster -- the
Myth of American Decline…” by Daniel Gross.
(I personally believe America is in a very serious state of
decline. But, we will see if Mr. Gross
can change my analysis.) I was stopped
in my tracks on page 2 by his statement: …“Congress and the president were
locked in an absurd standoff over extending the debt ceiling. … official Washington had managed to turn a
once-routine formality into a circular firing squad.” Unfortunately, Mr. Gross didn’t elaborate on
the explosive implications of his statement.
Does a “once-routine formality” mean that the national debt will
automatically increase forever?!
Apparently, that is exactly what he meant, because our currency and
economy are based on that government debt.
Consequently, as our population and economy expand, the national debt
will expand right along with them. The
“routine formality” of raising the debt ceiling reminds me of the algorithms in
billionaire New York city Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Bloomberg Terminal (aka the
“Bloomberg Machine”). Those Nobel Prize
winning algorithms predicted that housing prices would go up forever. We all know how that worked out – Crash! I only bring this up to reinforce my point
that the national debt is an integral part of our economic system. (Have you ever heard of “fixed income
investments”?)
This
means all the dire warnings and hand wringing over raising the debt ceiling and
the “unsustainable” national debt are really just self-serving political
rhetoric. The debt ceiling will always
be raised. But, on the other hand, the
debt alarmism rhetoric is a real and deadly threat to social security,
Medicare, Medicaid, the “trust funds,” the Pension Benefit Guarantee
Corporation and the power of the American government. How is the national debt a threat to the
“social safety net” (a term I dislike)?
The answer is simple. Our stupid,
debt based economic system can’t completely service our stupid national
debt. Something has to go, and we know
what that is. “Entitlements.” Are you
getting the picture?
Why
do I dislike the term social safety net?
It implies that it is normal for lives to be ruined by the instability
of our economic system and social security, Medicare and Medicaid exist to
catch people as they plunge into the economic abyss. This stupid notion gets the private sector
off the hook for their responsibility to provide the American people with a
stable and prosperous economic system.
Are people so stupid that they can’t figure out that social security and
Medicare are an integral part of the compensation package of every working American
and not an optional afterthought?
Social
security and Medicare are called entitlements because we paid into them and we are entitled to that
money. Of course, we all know that there
is a funding shortfall problem. Whose
fault is that? Conservatives and
Republicans say it is the fault of the workers because they are living too long!!! Actually, real workers, people who really
WORK for a living are not living
longer. It is true that the average life
span is longer but, surprise; longer life spans aren’t the problem. The problem is our greedy, selfish,
deregulated, globalized, financialized, free market economic system. Over the years, workers simply weren’t paid
enough money to properly fund the social security and Medicare systems. And, to make matters worse, the politicians
were stealing the trust fund money and adding the amount of the stolen money to
the national debt in the form of IOUs!
When
I hear multi-millionaire and billionaire bankers, businessmen and CEOs say they
are willing to pay higher taxes only if we cut entitlements I want to start
smashing things. Why would I have such
an angry reaction? I go ballistic because
it is the bankers and the CEOs
who are responsible for the social security and Medicare funding short
fall!!! This is self-evident, but I will
connect the dots anyway. Bankers prefer
to invest in the most profitable businesses.
As they say: “Capital chases return” (on invested dollars). The more a business slashes wages and
benefits the more profitable they become.
Consequently, less money is available for the social security and
Medicare systems. It’s that simple. And let’s not forget the CEOs and
stockholders. The CEOs want profit
growth because profit growth means that huge salaries, perks and golden
parachutes are even bigger, and profit growth means more capital gains on their
stock and bigger dividends. The
stockholders want profit growth for the capital gains (that they didn’t work
for).
So,
the globalized free market business model demands union busting, off shoring,
downsizing and a lean and mean work environment. The workers are expected to work until they
die and pay for their own healthcare with their “globally competitive”
wages. Remember, the New Normal economic
benchmark is the lowest subsistence wages, the most miserly “benefits,” the
most brutal, dangerous working conditions, with maximum job insecurity in the
most heartless, inhumane “emerging market economies” of the world. That is the ideal. And, that is a big part of the underfunding
problem of social security and Medicare.
For
almost a century, conservatives, Republicans and business interests have been
battling the Democrats in order to deny the American people universal
healthcare. Do these people have no
shame? Because I know about Treasury
issued debt-free money, it makes me very angry when I hear multimillionaire
bankers, CEOs, politicians and conservative talk show shills say: “We just
can’t afford it.” We can afford it, stupid! I cast a wide net for my information. So I listen to conservative talk radio when
I’m driving. For years, I have been a
believer in the ethical teachings of Jesus and the Old Testament Prophets. But, I never thought much about the existence
of the devil until I started listening to conservative talk radio.
Here
is a question that has never come up, as far as I know. If the private sector wasn’t greedy and
selfish, could social security, Medicare, Medicaid, the Pension Benefit
Guarantee Corporation and the government, in general, be properly funded with
fairly shared business profits and taxes?
I don’t think so. If that is the
case, where does that leave us? The
answer is obvious: Treasury issued debt-free money. That is what this blog is all about. If our economic system, in its current form,
can’t provide health care and pensions for the sick and elderly workers who
earned and deserve it, there must be an alternative. This is why I have attacked and so thoroughly
debunked the myth that “printing money causes inflation.” This myth and corrupt politicians are the two
things that stand in the way of Treasury issued debt-free money and a more
stable and prosperous life for the American people. Rebuttals to my analysis and proposals from
reputable pundits, economists and politicians can be sent to post office box
815, Coraopolis, PA 15108. I will put
their counter arguments on this blog, and I will debate them. The debate will be public and in the
historical record.
……………………………….
Shifting
gears, I have to say something about my hero, Federal Reserve (Fed) Chairman
Ben Bernanke. I have been told that on
my blog I make him out to be some kind of folk hero. That’s exactly what I’m doing because, to me,
he is a folk hero. And, today (12-12-12)
he reinforced my opinion of him. When
you start talking about the Federal Reserve, quantitative easing, bond buying,
the Fed funds rate, primary securities dealers, repos, reverse repos and the
Fed’s balance sheet, most people’s eyes glaze over. Not me, I love it. So I think I know what I’m talking about when
I say Helicopter Ben is a hero.
According
to standard economic and monetary theory, when the economy is sluggish, the
Federal Reserve lowers interest rates to stimulate the economy. This is normal. This is what the Fed is supposed to do under
these economic conditions. In a
convoluted way, which I don’t like and won’t try to explain, this gives more
money to the banks and businesses. But,
as we all know, the banks and businesses are sitting on the money and,
consequently, we have a sluggish economy.
This is the Capital Strike that I discuss extensively on this blog. [This is a good point to throw in a quick
correction. I stated somewhere on this
blog that the banks and business are sitting on “8 trillion dollars of
cash.” This mistake was the result of me
misunderstanding a statement by former Congressman Dick Armey. I thought he said $2 to 8 trillion. Apparently, he actually said $2.8
trillion. Sorry about the mistake. My hearing isn’t what it used to be – jet
engines and loud rock n roll will do that.]
According
to my Romney Campaign Conspiracy Theory, the Capital Strike was designed to put
Mitt in the White House when President Obama got blamed for the sluggish
economy. That didn’t work, so now this
economic blackmail is being used to force the Democrats to cut taxes on the
rich, businesses, capital gains, dividends, deregulate and to force them to
slash “entitlements.” This is all very
slick and diabolical but there is one problem – the Fed’s low interest
rates. The financial services “industry”
doesn’t like low interest rates for obvious reasons. Now, the business talking heads are on TV
today with all kinds of whacky theories about how Ben’s money printing and low
interest rates are hurting the economy.
But
here is the good part. Chairman Bernanke
said to the business community: when you lower the unemployment rate to 6.5%,
I’ll give you higher interest rates.
Brilliant! Fantastic! Helicopter Ben called their bluff. He made job creation a condition for the
higher interest rates that they want.
This was a brilliant tactical move.
But the Chairman may have inadvertently exposed a very serious weakness
in the structure of the “new economy.”
One pundit coined the term “QE infinity,” that is, infinite quantitative
easing. What could he have meant by
that? Did he mean to imply that in the
New Normal economy we will never get
unemployment down to 6.5%? Of course,
nobody asked him to elaborate on the implications of “QE infinity.” This New Normal is why I say the
globalization and financialization of our economy is a disaster for America.
The
Federal Reserve has a dual mandate: maximize employment and control
inflation. Recently, conservatives,
Republicans and conservative pundits have been calling for the Fed to dump the
first part of the mandate. What a
stunning coincidence. Did they fear that
we had a Federal Reserve Chairman with the guts to put some real muscle behind
his commitment to maximum employment? (I
wonder what Ron Paul thinks about that.)
That’s why Chairman Bernanke is a folk hero.
And,
I want to commend Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner for calling the Republican’s
bluff on the debt ceiling. In a
brilliant tactical move, he caught everybody flatfooted when he said take the
decision to raise the debt ceiling out of the hands of Congress and give it to
the president. The media were
shell-shocked into confusion or silence.
I was jubilant because Secretary Geithner confirmed what I have been
saying on this blog: the debt ceiling will always be raised so why waste time
arguing about raising it? And, by all
means, don’t let the Republicans use the debt ceiling as a weapon to attack social
security, Medicare and Medicaid.
I’ve
been telling people for a long time that Chairman Bernanke and Secretary
Geithner are the smartest guys in the room.
Fighting for American jobs and protecting social security, Medicare and
Medicaid makes them folk heroes in my book.